Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:07

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is a man over 50 not married no kids a red flag?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do people say "tall, dark, and handsome" when they actually mean "tall, white, and handsome"?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Doesn't Musk hire Security for his Tesla dealerships?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
2025 Nashville Superspeedway pit stall assignments - NASCAR.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 launch games: Every Switch 2 game available on day one - Video Games Chronicle
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.